2005: NOAA Fisheries, Santa Cruz Laboratory Second Review of the November 6, 2003 Petition from Homer T. McCrary Concerning Coho Salmon South of San Francisco and Response

March 10, 2013

Document submitted by Homer T. McCrary to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 10 May 2005. noaasecondreviewandresponse10may05  

Read the full article →

2005: Another human casualty of the coho salmon south of San Francisco Endangered Species Act listing.

March 10, 2013

The Sierra Club strikes again, using bogus “endangered species” to bankrupt responsible citizens… not exactly what you thought your donation was being used for. 19 February 2005. The Santa Cruz SentinelFebruary 19, 2005 Davenport’s battered barn to stay just that – Sierra Club court victory ends plan for wine and cheese shop By Genevieve Bookwalter […]

Read the full article →

2005: Were Coho Salmon South of San Francisco Ever Native, Indigenous?

March 10, 2013

Testimony of V. W. Kaczynski, Ph.D. Before the California Fish and Game Commission. 3 February 2005. 2005kaczynski

Read the full article →

2005: The CDFG Review of the June 17, 2004 Petition to Delist Coho Salmon South of San Francisco and our Response

March 10, 2013

Big Creek Lumber Co. and the Central Coast Forest Association correspondence to the California Fish and Game Commission dated 26 January 2005. 2005cdfgreviewandresponse

Read the full article →

2005: Unanswered Letter Regarding Pete Adams’ Second Review of November 6, 2003 Petition Concerning Coho Salmon South of San Francisco

March 10, 2013

Homer T. McCrary sent the following letter to Pete Adams, Fisheries Branch Chief, NOAA Fisheries, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Santa Cruz Laboratory 18 January 2005.  It was never answered. lettertonoaascl18jan05

Read the full article →

2004: Letter Regarding November 12, 2004 Telephone Conversation With Rodney McInnis, Regional Administrator, NOAA Fisheries, Southwest Region

March 10, 2013

submitted by Homer T. McCrary to Rodney McInnis, Regional Administrator, NOAA Fisheries, Southwest Region 2 December 2004. lettertonoaa2dec04b

Read the full article →

2004: Inquiry Regarding Postponed Determination As To Whether Petitioned Action is Warranted

March 10, 2013

Homer T. McCrary sent the following document to Craig Wingert, Fishery Management Specialist, NOAA Fisheries, Southwest Region 2 December 2004. lettertonoaa2dec04

Read the full article →

2004: Inquiry Regarding Determination Whether Petitioned Action is Warranted

March 10, 2013

Homer T. McCrary submitted the following document to Craig Wingert, NOAA Fisheries, Southwest Region 12 November 2004. lettertonoaa12nov04

Read the full article →

2004: What is an Evolutionary Significant Unit (ESU)?

March 10, 2013

According to the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS, NOAA Fisheries) a population must satisfy two criteria to be considered an ESU: (1) it must be substantially reproductively isolated from other conspecific population units; and (2) it must represent an important component in the evolutionary legacy of a species. 69 Fed. Reg. at 31355. Unfortunately there […]

Read the full article →

2004: Addendum to Response to NOAA Fisheries, Santa Cruz Laboratory, review of November 6, 2003 petition concerning coho salmon south of San Francisco

March 10, 2013

Homer T. McCrary submitted the following document to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 25 October 2004. responsetonoaareviewadd25oct04

Read the full article →

← Previous Entries

Next Entries →